English => Greek (Ελληνικά, ελληνικός)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=el&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Latin (lingua Latina)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=la&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Dutch (Nederlands)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=nl&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Japanese (日本語)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=ja&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Chinese (中文)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=zh-CN&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Korean (한국어)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=ko&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Arabic (al-arabia) (العربية)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=ar&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Spanish (Español)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=es&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => French (Français)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=fr&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => German (Deutsch)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=de&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Finnish (suomi)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=fi&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Italian (Italiano)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=it&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Portuguese (Português (Brazil))
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=pt&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Russian (русский)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=ru&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
(\_~_/) This is Bunny.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=pt&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
English => Russian (русский)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=en&tl=ru&u=https://changelogreadingroom.blogspot.com/2021/07/bunny.html
(\_~_/) This is Bunny.
(='.'=) Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
(\_^_/) This is Bunny.
(='.'=) Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
(\_Y_/) This is Bunny.
(='.'=) Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
(\__/) This is Bunny.
(='.'=) Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help her gain world domination.
____________________________________
“It is an under acknowledged truism that, just as you are what you eat, how and what you think depends on what information you are exposed to.”, p.13, Tim Wu, The Master Switch, 2010.
____________________________________
That selection process is perception. “I am a very big believer”, Hofstadter told me, “that the core processes of cognition are very, very tightly related to perception.”
── Kevin Kelly, 1994,
from the book, Out of Control,
p.18, filename: ooc-mf.pdf
p.18
The act of perceiving and the act of remembering are the same. ([ not [exactly] the same [at each layers], however they are highly similar; we believe they are so similar - as if they are the same - because theyuse [share] common brain neural circuit (the neurons and the interconnections) ]) Both assemble an emergent whole from many distributed pieces.
“Memory”, says cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter, “is highly reconstructive. Retrieval from memory involves selecting out of a vast field of things what's important and what is not important, emphasizing the important stuff, downplaying the unimportant.” That selection process is perception. “I am a very big believer”, Hofstadter told me, “that the core processes of cognition are very, very tightly related to perception.”
(p.18, Out of Control, Kevin Kelly, 1984)
____________________________________
Michael Lewis, The undoing project, 2017 [ ]
p.153
Avishai Margalit
“I'm waiting in this corridor,” said Margalit. “And Amos comes to me, agitated, really. He started by dragging me into a room. He said, You won't believe what happened to me. He tells me that he had given this talk and Danny had said, Brilliant talk, but I don't believe a word of it. Something was really bothering him, and so I pressed him. He said, ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act.’”
p.153
He said, ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act.’
p.343
People didn't choose between things, they chose between descriptions of things.
p.343
“choice architecture”
The decisions people made were driven by the way they were presented. People didn't simply know what they wanted; they took cues from their environment. They constructed their preferences. And they followed paths of least resistance, even when they paid a heavy price for it.
(Michael Lewis, The undoing project, 2017, p.153, p.343 )
____________________________________
Taking cues from the environment has a big picture relationship to social referencing. “... showing off his social referencing skills. Social referencing, which is what we are doing when we look to another's emotional reaction to help us assess a novel object or situation, is an important milestone that kicks in during the first year of life, and it is one of the most fundamental ways that humans connect to each other.” (p.167, Frank Moss, The sorcerers and their apprentices, 2011)
____________________________________
People do not make judgement between things, they make decision based on the explanation of things. It is in the description and explanation that you can influence and shape perception, and through perception, people make cognitive judgement. What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think ‘they are’.
Harold Innis (Harold Adams Innis)
◇ The shift in perception redefines “knowledge.”
(a.) Acting involves changing our behavior,
(b.) Reframing involves changing our thinking, and
(c.) Transforming involves changing our perceptions.
____________________________________
“It is an under acknowledged truism that, just as you are what you eat, how and what you think depends on what information you are exposed to.”, p.13, Tim Wu, The Master Switch, 2010.
____________________________________
That selection process is perception. “I am a very big believer”, Hofstadter told me, “that the core processes of cognition are very, very tightly related to perception.”
── Kevin Kelly, 1994,
from the book, Out of Control,
p.18, filename: ooc-mf.pdf
p.18
The act of perceiving and the act of remembering are the same. ([ not [exactly] the same [at each layers], however they are highly similar; we believe they are so similar - as if they are the same - because they
“Memory”, says cognitive scientist Douglas Hofstadter, “is highly reconstructive. Retrieval from memory involves selecting out of a vast field of things what's important and what is not important, emphasizing the important stuff, downplaying the unimportant.” That selection process is perception. “I am a very big believer”, Hofstadter told me, “that the core processes of cognition are very, very tightly related to perception.”
(p.18, Out of Control, Kevin Kelly, 1984)
____________________________________
Michael Lewis, The undoing project, 2017 [ ]
p.153
Avishai Margalit
“I'm waiting in this corridor,” said Margalit. “And Amos comes to me, agitated, really. He started by dragging me into a room. He said, You won't believe what happened to me. He tells me that he had given this talk and Danny had said, Brilliant talk, but I don't believe a word of it. Something was really bothering him, and so I pressed him. He said, ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act.’”
p.153
He said, ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act.’
p.343
People didn't choose between things, they chose between descriptions of things.
p.343
“choice architecture”
The decisions people made were driven by the way they were presented. People didn't simply know what they wanted; they took cues from their environment. They constructed their preferences. And they followed paths of least resistance, even when they paid a heavy price for it.
(Michael Lewis, The undoing project, 2017, p.153, p.343 )
____________________________________
Taking cues from the environment has a big picture relationship to social referencing. “... showing off his social referencing skills. Social referencing, which is what we are doing when we look to another's emotional reaction to help us assess a novel object or situation, is an important milestone that kicks in during the first year of life, and it is one of the most fundamental ways that humans connect to each other.” (p.167, Frank Moss, The sorcerers and their apprentices, 2011)
____________________________________
People do not make judgement between things, they make decision based on the explanation of things. It is in the description and explanation that you can influence and shape perception, and through perception, people make cognitive judgement. What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think ‘they are’.
Harold Innis (Harold Adams Innis)
◇ The shift in perception redefines “knowledge.”
(a.) Acting involves changing our behavior,
(b.) Reframing involves changing our thinking, and
(c.) Transforming involves changing our perceptions.
____________________________________
Thom Hartmann, Cracking the Code, 2007, 2008 [ ]
A Note to the Reader
This book is written in a new language. Every word mean precisely what it says. The tools of communication revealed herein are also used in its writing. You man spot many of these on your first read through, although they will probably be most visible, most clearly heard, and most easily picked out on a subsequent reading.
p.53
I discovered that once you decode the way that human beings make decisions――how our neurons fire――you can shape your language to take advantage of that code. The National Security Agency (NSA) knows this code. So does Madison Avenue. (I've done training for both.) And no one has cracked the communication code more effectively than modern Republicans.
([ many years ago, this book was borrow without asking from inside the bedroom -- to the people who took it -- please return the same book in the original condition minus wear, tear, usage, and depreciation (I fully understand that material, things, and money inside my home is like a library -- strangers come over and borrow things -- at some stage you should return them, pass them forward, and pay ... .) ])
( Cracking the Code: How to win hearts, change minds, and restore America's original vision, by Thom Hartmann, © 2007, 2008; )
____________________________________
A Note to the Reader
This book is written in a new language. Every word mean precisely what it says. The tools of communication revealed herein are also used in its writing. You man spot many of these on your first read through, although they will probably be most visible, most clearly heard, and most easily picked out on a subsequent reading.
p.53
I discovered that once you decode the way that human beings make decisions――how our neurons fire――you can shape your language to take advantage of that code. The National Security Agency (NSA) knows this code. So does Madison Avenue. (I've done training for both.) And no one has cracked the communication code more effectively than modern Republicans.
([ many years ago, this book was borrow without asking from inside the bedroom -- to the people who took it -- please return the same book in the original condition minus wear, tear, usage, and depreciation (I fully understand that material, things, and money inside my home is like a library -- strangers come over and borrow things -- at some stage you should return them, pass them forward, and pay ... .) ])
( Cracking the Code: How to win hearts, change minds, and restore America's original vision, by Thom Hartmann, © 2007, 2008; )
____________________________________
• Knowledge has an implication of validity, of truth; the IMAGE is what I believe to be true ― my subjective knowledge of the world; It is this Image that governs my behavior. (Boulding 1956: 5―6) (p.238, Gerald M. Weinberg and Daniela Weinberg, General principles of systems design, 1988)
p.238
<block citation begin>
I know that when I get into my car there are some things I must do to start it; some things I must do to back out of the parking lot; some things I must do to drive home. I know that if I jump off a high place I will probably hurt myself. I know that there are some things that would probably not be good for me to eat or to drink. I know certain precautions that are advisable to take to maintain good health. I know that if I lean to far backward in my chair as I sit here at my desk, I will probably fall over. I live, in other words, in a world of reasonably stable relationships, a world of “ifs” and “thens,” of “if I do this, then that will happen . . .”
What I have been talking about is knowledge. Knowledge, perhaps, is not a good word for this. Perhaps one would rather say my IMAGE of the world. Knowledge has an implication of validity, of truth. What I am talking about is what I believe to be true; my subjective knowledge. It is this Image that largely governs my behavior. (Boulding 1956: 5―6)
</block citation end>
(Weinberg, Gerald M.; General principles of systems design, Originally published as: On the design of stable system. 1979, 1. system analysis, QA402.W43 1988, copyright © 1988 by Gerald M. Weinberg and Daniela Weinberg, portions of this book appear in Becoming a technical leader, The secret of consulting, and Rethinking systems analysis & design, p.238)
____________________________________
p.238
<block citation begin>
I know that when I get into my car there are some things I must do to start it; some things I must do to back out of the parking lot; some things I must do to drive home. I know that if I jump off a high place I will probably hurt myself. I know that there are some things that would probably not be good for me to eat or to drink. I know certain precautions that are advisable to take to maintain good health. I know that if I lean to far backward in my chair as I sit here at my desk, I will probably fall over. I live, in other words, in a world of reasonably stable relationships, a world of “ifs” and “thens,” of “if I do this, then that will happen . . .”
What I have been talking about is knowledge. Knowledge, perhaps, is not a good word for this. Perhaps one would rather say my IMAGE of the world. Knowledge has an implication of validity, of truth. What I am talking about is what I believe to be true; my subjective knowledge. It is this Image that largely governs my behavior. (Boulding 1956: 5―6)
</block citation end>
(Weinberg, Gerald M.; General principles of systems design, Originally published as: On the design of stable system. 1979, 1. system analysis, QA402.W43 1988, copyright © 1988 by Gerald M. Weinberg and Daniela Weinberg, portions of this book appear in Becoming a technical leader, The secret of consulting, and Rethinking systems analysis & design, p.238)
____________________________________
Kenneth Boulding (1956)
from chapter I, The Image. Kenneth E. Boulding, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press (Ann Arbor paperback). 1956.
https://wedgeblade.net/files/archives_assets/20885.pdf
https://wedgeblade.net/
from chapter I, The Image. Kenneth E. Boulding, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press (Ann Arbor paperback). 1956.
https://wedgeblade.net/files/archives_assets/20885.pdf
https://wedgeblade.net/
____________________________________
Mark Stefik and Barbara Stefik, Breakthrough, 2004 [ ]
p.92
John Seely Brown
The search for a voice is empowering. And that is something that you don't learn in graduate school, by and large. Talk helps a great deal, but there is a sense of not saying too much and a sense of asking the right questions.
There is also a sense of trying to draw out a distinction because we learn to see differently Around Distinctions. So if you launch a distinction, that distinction helps somebody see something about themselves or others that they can't see otherwise. How do you grind new eyeglasses for seeing things differently? You grind new eyeglasses by creating distinctions actually. So you reflect on a situation that they are a part of, and that then starts to shape their sight, and their ability to see, and to see differently.
In some sense, mentoring is a lot like therapy. You help people to discover their own voice by launching distinctions in situ [in position; in its original place] that enable them to see themselves and others differently. You create a very safe and encouraging context for that to happen. And in that safety and willingness to suspend your own disbelief, you enter their space as best as you can. Then in the right moment, you see if there is something very simple to say that suddenly turns their perspective.
(Stefik, Mark., Breakthrough : stories and strategies of radical innovation / Mark Stefik and Barbara Stefik., 1. technological innovation., 2. inventions., 2004, pp.183-184)
____________________________________
Why [The search for a voice] is an adventure?
Because "you leave the safety of the world you know and enter the unknown.";
"In the Departure stage, you leave the safety of the world you know and enter the unknown.";
if you want (young or old) people to learn, you MUST provide a sense of safety;
they might want a psychological safe room, a secure home base, ....
https://scottjeffrey.com/heros-journey-steps/
____________________________________
• That selection process is perception.
• The core processes of cognition are very tightly related to perception.
• ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act’.
• People chose between the descriptions of things.
• People make decision based on the explanation of things. What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think ‘they are’.
• The shift in perception redefines “knowledge”, and to expand on that, the shift in perception disables “knowledge”.
• If all reality is mediated by perception (sensory interaction, interactive exploration), and perception and thinking is a not a separate act (Look, Jane, Look), and if all perception is a construction (a make-believe, an illusion), then choice is an illusion (a construct, a make believe, a Matrix). Therefore we live in a Dream - not the same kind of dream that we [get]dream when you are asleep and sleeping. No, we live in a kind of waking Dream (a mental model of reality, a mirror image of how we believe the world works (a working model)). And the questions that are worth asking are these: Are we a co-creator of this waking Dream, or, are we merely a consumer, the end-user of this waking Dream? Qui bono (who benefit), who are the beneficiaries of this waking Dream if we are not a co-creator of the Dream.
• Stop, Look, and Listen
• the spaces between the words are invisible; there are even smaller spaces between each letters; there are spacing between the lines; these empty invisible spaces enable us to read. That which is invisible is the most important enabler in the reading process. How do you know the spaces are there? You know the spaces are there by the very existence of the non-spaces. A ‘Shift in perception’ enables the rediscovery ofthe “knowledge”.
p.92
John Seely Brown
The search for a voice is empowering. And that is something that you don't learn in graduate school, by and large. Talk helps a great deal, but there is a sense of not saying too much and a sense of asking the right questions.
There is also a sense of trying to draw out a distinction because we learn to see differently Around Distinctions. So if you launch a distinction, that distinction helps somebody see something about themselves or others that they can't see otherwise. How do you grind new eyeglasses for seeing things differently? You grind new eyeglasses by creating distinctions actually. So you reflect on a situation that they are a part of, and that then starts to shape their sight, and their ability to see, and to see differently.
In some sense, mentoring is a lot like therapy. You help people to discover their own voice by launching distinctions in situ [in position; in its original place] that enable them to see themselves and others differently. You create a very safe and encouraging context for that to happen. And in that safety and willingness to suspend your own disbelief, you enter their space as best as you can. Then in the right moment, you see if there is something very simple to say that suddenly turns their perspective.
(Stefik, Mark., Breakthrough : stories and strategies of radical innovation / Mark Stefik and Barbara Stefik., 1. technological innovation., 2. inventions., 2004, pp.183-184)
____________________________________
Why [The search for a voice] is an adventure?
Because "you leave the safety of the world you know and enter the unknown.";
"In the Departure stage, you leave the safety of the world you know and enter the unknown.";
if you want (young or old) people to learn, you MUST provide a sense of safety;
they might want a psychological safe room, a secure home base, ....
https://scottjeffrey.com/heros-journey-steps/
____________________________________
• That selection process is perception.
• The core processes of cognition are very tightly related to perception.
• ‘It cannot be that judgement does not connect with perception. Thinking is not a separate act’.
• People chose between the descriptions of things.
• People make decision based on the explanation of things. What concerns me is not the way things are, but rather the way people think ‘they are’.
• The shift in perception redefines “knowledge”, and to expand on that, the shift in perception disables “knowledge”.
• If all reality is mediated by perception (sensory interaction, interactive exploration), and perception and thinking is a not a separate act (Look, Jane, Look), and if all perception is a construction (a make-believe, an illusion), then choice is an illusion (a construct, a make believe, a Matrix). Therefore we live in a Dream - not the same kind of dream that we [get]
• Stop, Look, and Listen
• the spaces between the words are invisible; there are even smaller spaces between each letters; there are spacing between the lines; these empty invisible spaces enable us to read. That which is invisible is the most important enabler in the reading process. How do you know the spaces are there? You know the spaces are there by the very existence of the non-spaces. A ‘Shift in perception’ enables the rediscovery of
• the silences between the melody are invisible; there are even shorter pauses between each notes; there are spacing between the lines; these empty invisible spaces enable us to read. That which is invisible is the most important enabler in the musical process. How do you know the silences, the spaces, the pauses are there? You know they are there by the very existence of the Everything else. A ‘Shift in perception’ enables the rediscovery of the “knowledge”.

